US/Mountain, 28 May - 2 June 2017
Finite-time synchronization of fractional-order simplest two-component chaotic oscillators
1 Research Group on Experimental and Applied Physics for Sustainable Development, Faculty of Science, Department of Physics, University of Dschang, P.O. Box 412, Dschang, Cameroon
2 Laboratory of Electronics and Signal Processing Faculty of Science, Department of Physics University of Dschang, P.O. Box 67, Dschang, Cameroon
3 Laboratoire de Mécanique et de Modélisation des Systèmes, L2MS, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Dschang, P.O. Box 67, Dschang, Cameroon
4 Lublin University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Nadbystrzycka 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
5 AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, Department of Process Control, Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
Received: 7 August 2016
Received in final form: 27 February 2017
Published online: 10 May 2017
The problem of finite-time synchronization of fractional-order simplest two-component chaotic oscillators operating at high frequency and application to digital cryptography is addressed. After the investigation of numerical chaotic behavior in the system, an adaptive feedback controller is designed to achieve the finite-time synchronization of two oscillators, based on the Lyapunov function. This controller could find application in many other fractional-order chaotic circuits. Applying synchronized fractional-order systems in digital cryptography, a well secured key system is obtained. Numerical simulations are given to illustrate and verify the analytic results.
Key words: Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
© The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.